<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Building a Backlinking Strategy: A Plan for SEO Success</title> <atom:link href="http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/</link> <description>Make Money Online Using Black Hat SEO Software that Works!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Mike Johnson</title><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1185</link> <dc:creator>Mike Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:01:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/?p=530#comment-1185</guid> <description>After just reading the sales letter and watching the videos I don&#039;t see how&lt;br&gt;link dozer could possibly be better than SENuke.  They are very quiet about&lt;br&gt;what sites they submit to and the actual overall strategy.  As for&lt;br&gt;Artificial Inteligence, I don&#039;t think so.  I might test it out if I have&lt;br&gt;time.  I have eaten my words more than once on programs like this, but&lt;br&gt;SENuke has improved month after month for over a year and a half now.  That&lt;br&gt;is a commitment that you rarely see in the Internet Marketing software&lt;br&gt;niche. Everyone is going to claim that a new program is better in order to&lt;br&gt;rake in Affiliate Commissions.  I am not ready to say anything until I see&lt;br&gt;it for myself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After just reading the sales letter and watching the videos I don&#39;t see how<br
/>link dozer could possibly be better than SENuke.  They are very quiet about<br
/>what sites they submit to and the actual overall strategy.  As for<br
/>Artificial Inteligence, I don&#39;t think so.  I might test it out if I have<br
/>time.  I have eaten my words more than once on programs like this, but<br
/>SENuke has improved month after month for over a year and a half now.  That<br
/>is a commitment that you rarely see in the Internet Marketing software<br
/>niche. Everyone is going to claim that a new program is better in order to<br
/>rake in Affiliate Commissions.  I am not ready to say anything until I see<br
/>it for myself.</p><p>Mike</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1184</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:09:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/?p=530#comment-1184</guid> <description>ok, thanks for the quick reply. The site is &lt;a href=&quot;http://linkdozer.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;linkdozer.com&lt;/a&gt;. Apparently linkdozer is less spammy but less automated than senuke, but has better long term results than senuke and also has built in spinner (I know results on senuke vary depending on how you use it). It&#039;s gotten good feedback on free forums like warrior and vita vee. If I go ahead with linkdozer will leave feedback here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, thanks for the quick reply. The site is <a
href="http://linkdozer.com" rel="nofollow">linkdozer.com</a>. Apparently linkdozer is less spammy but less automated than senuke, but has better long term results than senuke and also has built in spinner (I know results on senuke vary depending on how you use it). It&#39;s gotten good feedback on free forums like warrior and vita vee. If I go ahead with linkdozer will leave feedback here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Johnson</title><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1183</link> <dc:creator>Mike Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:42:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/?p=530#comment-1183</guid> <description>Sorry, I have not heard of or used link dozer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I have not heard of or used link dozer.</p><p>Mike</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:47:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/?p=530#comment-1182</guid> <description>thanks for providing this fantastic blueprint for getting backlinks. do you by any chance have any experience with link dozer, or heard any feedback on it you can trust? I am considering this service, but may use the above methods and invest in some of the tools instead.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for providing this fantastic blueprint for getting backlinks. do you by any chance have any experience with link dozer, or heard any feedback on it you can trust? I am considering this service, but may use the above methods and invest in some of the tools instead.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: emmaburge</title><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1190</link> <dc:creator>emmaburge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:18:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/?p=530#comment-1190</guid> <description>Hi Mike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks very much for taking the time to reply. Makes things much clearer :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are a couple of things I was confused about (dont worry theres not that much really, its mostly quotes from your article!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;KEYWORDS + ARTICLES&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Now that I have my keywords, I place each one in the Google Search tool again and see all of the related keywords that go with them.  I now create my website pages, reviews, articles, and social bookmarking blurbs. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Okay, so here in the quote above  you mean that you take your 4 base keywords that you&#039;ve got, and write one article for each one, then write an article for each related keyword to your base keyword? (You say later: &quot;I have by now created a minimum of one article for each keyword phrase.&quot;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The anchor text within the articles - I understand that this should be one of your 4 base keywords/phrases, and it should not link to the homepage. But does the page it links to have to incorporate the same keyphrase/word as in the article&#039;s anchor text? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also - the amount of keywords per site. So, you have 4 base keywords/phrases, then 4 related keywords/phrases for each base keyword. Totalling 20 keywords/phrases? Is that right?? My sites are small - some only 4 pages. I can barely cram 5-6 in there! Should i reduce the amount of keywords?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other bit of the article I didnt understand was just this sentence: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot; All of these either have the keywords in them and they have the related keywords.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its just the inclusion of &quot;either&quot; that confuses me - do you mean:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &quot;All of these either have the keywords in them OR they have the related keywords&quot;&lt;br&gt;or&lt;br&gt;&quot;All of these have the keywords in them and they have the related keywords&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SITE STRUCTURE + LINKS&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is also this part which I got a bit panicked about..I know this is one of the most important parts of the article as you refer back to it at the end, so I&#039;d like to be clear on this and would appreciate your help:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;You have to ensure that you link all of your pages within your sites together,&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you literally mean add a link from every page of your site to every other page of your site? If so, what if you have a blog? you&#039;d end up with huge long lists of links to every other post on your entire blog, plus every other page, on every page??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;...preferrably with a Silo type structure. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tried to find out but could not find anything that&#039;d simply tell me what a silo is, either!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you can see I&#039;ve studied your article pretty hard, and am going to use it as a guideline for my first ever SEO project - thankyou very much!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Emma</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike</p><p>Thanks very much for taking the time to reply. Makes things much clearer <img
src='http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Here are a couple of things I was confused about (dont worry theres not that much really, its mostly quotes from your article!)</p><p>KEYWORDS + ARTICLES</p><p>&#8220;Now that I have my keywords, I place each one in the Google Search tool again and see all of the related keywords that go with them.  I now create my website pages, reviews, articles, and social bookmarking blurbs. &#8220;</p><p>Okay, so here in the quote above  you mean that you take your 4 base keywords that you&#39;ve got, and write one article for each one, then write an article for each related keyword to your base keyword? (You say later: &#8220;I have by now created a minimum of one article for each keyword phrase.&#8221;)</p><p>The anchor text within the articles &#8211; I understand that this should be one of your 4 base keywords/phrases, and it should not link to the homepage. But does the page it links to have to incorporate the same keyphrase/word as in the article&#39;s anchor text?</p><p>Also &#8211; the amount of keywords per site. So, you have 4 base keywords/phrases, then 4 related keywords/phrases for each base keyword. Totalling 20 keywords/phrases? Is that right?? My sites are small &#8211; some only 4 pages. I can barely cram 5-6 in there! Should i reduce the amount of keywords?</p><p>The other bit of the article I didnt understand was just this sentence:</p><p>&#8221; All of these either have the keywords in them and they have the related keywords.&#8221;</p><p>Its just the inclusion of &#8220;either&#8221; that confuses me &#8211; do you mean:</p><p> &#8220;All of these either have the keywords in them OR they have the related keywords&#8221;<br
/>or<br
/>&#8220;All of these have the keywords in them and they have the related keywords&#8221;</p><p>SITE STRUCTURE + LINKS</p><p>There is also this part which I got a bit panicked about..I know this is one of the most important parts of the article as you refer back to it at the end, so I&#39;d like to be clear on this and would appreciate your help:</p><p>&#8220;You have to ensure that you link all of your pages within your sites together,&#8221;</p><p>Do you literally mean add a link from every page of your site to every other page of your site? If so, what if you have a blog? you&#39;d end up with huge long lists of links to every other post on your entire blog, plus every other page, on every page??</p><p>&#8220;&#8230;preferrably with a Silo type structure. &#8220;</p><p>I tried to find out but could not find anything that&#39;d simply tell me what a silo is, either!</p><p>As you can see I&#39;ve studied your article pretty hard, and am going to use it as a guideline for my first ever SEO project &#8211; thankyou very much!</p><p>Emma</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Johnson</title><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link> <dc:creator>Mike Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:26:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/?p=530#comment-1189</guid> <description>Emma,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A lot of good questions here.  First off, yes, you can use just Market&lt;br&gt;Samurai and SENuke and you can be successful.  Especially if you are&lt;br&gt;focusing on one main website.  The basic premise is this, the Keyword Anchor&lt;br&gt;text you use initially is your base keywords.  This keyword(s) is the main&lt;br&gt;one you are focused on for your site.  However, when you do your Google&lt;br&gt;Keyword Search, you will see a lot of related keywords.  Look at this list&lt;br&gt;of keywords and you will pick which ones apply to your site and target&lt;br&gt;audience the most.  Use these keywords in the text on your site&#039;s pages, in&lt;br&gt;Titles, and in your Meta Description and Meta Titles.  Once you get done&lt;br&gt;with the base backlink strategy outlined here, then start working in these&lt;br&gt;supplemental keywords as Anchor Text keywords in your articles and at any&lt;br&gt;site you can submit to using SENuke.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does this make sense?  Do you need anymore specifics?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emma,</p><p>A lot of good questions here.  First off, yes, you can use just Market<br
/>Samurai and SENuke and you can be successful.  Especially if you are<br
/>focusing on one main website.  The basic premise is this, the Keyword Anchor<br
/>text you use initially is your base keywords.  This keyword(s) is the main<br
/>one you are focused on for your site.  However, when you do your Google<br
/>Keyword Search, you will see a lot of related keywords.  Look at this list<br
/>of keywords and you will pick which ones apply to your site and target<br
/>audience the most.  Use these keywords in the text on your site&#39;s pages, in<br
/>Titles, and in your Meta Description and Meta Titles.  Once you get done<br
/>with the base backlink strategy outlined here, then start working in these<br
/>supplemental keywords as Anchor Text keywords in your articles and at any<br
/>site you can submit to using SENuke.</p><p>Does this make sense?  Do you need anymore specifics?</p><p>Mike</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: emmaburge</title><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1192</link> <dc:creator>emmaburge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:45:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/?p=530#comment-1192</guid> <description>Thanks very much Mike, will really help me. Enjoy your travels, and please feel free to email me rather than turning your comment section into a full blown Q&amp;A!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Emma</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much Mike, will really help me. Enjoy your travels, and please feel free to email me rather than turning your comment section into a full blown Q&#038;A!</p><p>Emma</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Johnson</title><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1191</link> <dc:creator>Mike Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:08:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/?p=530#comment-1191</guid> <description>Emma,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t have time to answer all of this right now as I am traveling.  When I&lt;br&gt;get a chance over the next few days I will answer your questions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emma,</p><p>I don&#39;t have time to answer all of this right now as I am traveling.  When I<br
/>get a chance over the next few days I will answer your questions.</p><p>Mike</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: emmaburge</title><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1188</link> <dc:creator>emmaburge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:45:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/?p=530#comment-1188</guid> <description>Hi Mike,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for this very insightful article. To give you an idea of my background, im intending to implement this strategy for my blog to try and get more hits for potential freelance modelling work. So, although im quite informed compared to the average person in my industry, im no expert, and i got a bit confused by some points of your article.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My main points of confusion are:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) I have only the budget to use Market Samurai and SENuke, and can trial a good article rewriting program. Is this plan still for me as i may not be able to use the other software so may have to skip steps -  i know id have to skip directory maximiser and Link farm evolution steps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) If this stil is for me, the one thing confusing me is: those extra keywords you search for after youve established your 4 related keywords to your base keywords, and how these extra keywords come into play in this SEO plan:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;I place each one in the Google Search tool again and see all of the related keywords that go with them.&quot; - so you search for more keywords related to your 4 keywords that you found from the intial base keywords? How many do you look for? And what do you use these extra keywords for?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Further quotes below come from intial confusion over those extra keywords you search for after youve already got your 4 main keywords.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;All of these either have the keywords in them and they have the related keywords.&quot; - i dont quite undertsnad this sentence. when you say &#039;the keywords in them&#039; are you refering to your base keywords, or your more specific 4 keywords that youve got from your base keywords? when you say &#039;and the related keywords&#039; do you mean &#039;or the related keywords&#039;? And by related keywords do you mean the keywords related to your more specific 4 keywords, or the 4 keywords related to your base keywords?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;I use the spin feature in UAW to ensure I cycle through my 4 keyword anchor text phrases across each article, so I spread all of the keywords across all of the articles.&quot; - and do you mean by this that you vary what keywords you use within your anchor text across different variations of the same article? by &#039;keyword anchor text phrase&#039; do you mean simply a link containing some of those 4 keywords you established within step 1, to the site youre trying to promote?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry this is such a long post. I have also tried to bullet point your strategy in my own words as a test. It would be very helpful if you could clarify the above for me or even more so if youc could take a look at my bullet pointed version to see if i am getting what youre saying right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks so much for your time. I very much appreciate it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Emma</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p><p>Thanks for this very insightful article. To give you an idea of my background, im intending to implement this strategy for my blog to try and get more hits for potential freelance modelling work. So, although im quite informed compared to the average person in my industry, im no expert, and i got a bit confused by some points of your article.</p><p>My main points of confusion are:</p><p>1) I have only the budget to use Market Samurai and SENuke, and can trial a good article rewriting program. Is this plan still for me as i may not be able to use the other software so may have to skip steps &#8211;  i know id have to skip directory maximiser and Link farm evolution steps.</p><p>2) If this stil is for me, the one thing confusing me is: those extra keywords you search for after youve established your 4 related keywords to your base keywords, and how these extra keywords come into play in this SEO plan:</p><p>&#8220;I place each one in the Google Search tool again and see all of the related keywords that go with them.&#8221; &#8211; so you search for more keywords related to your 4 keywords that you found from the intial base keywords? How many do you look for? And what do you use these extra keywords for?</p><p>Further quotes below come from intial confusion over those extra keywords you search for after youve already got your 4 main keywords.</p><p>&#8220;All of these either have the keywords in them and they have the related keywords.&#8221; - i dont quite undertsnad this sentence. when you say &#39;the keywords in them&#39; are you refering to your base keywords, or your more specific 4 keywords that youve got from your base keywords? when you say &#39;and the related keywords&#39; do you mean &#39;or the related keywords&#39;? And by related keywords do you mean the keywords related to your more specific 4 keywords, or the 4 keywords related to your base keywords?</p><p>&#8220;I use the spin feature in UAW to ensure I cycle through my 4 keyword anchor text phrases across each article, so I spread all of the keywords across all of the articles.&#8221; &#8211; and do you mean by this that you vary what keywords you use within your anchor text across different variations of the same article? by &#39;keyword anchor text phrase&#39; do you mean simply a link containing some of those 4 keywords you established within step 1, to the site youre trying to promote?</p><p>Sorry this is such a long post. I have also tried to bullet point your strategy in my own words as a test. It would be very helpful if you could clarify the above for me or even more so if youc could take a look at my bullet pointed version to see if i am getting what youre saying right.</p><p>Thanks so much for your time. I very much appreciate it.</p><p>Emma</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Johnson</title><link>http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/seo/building-backlinking-strategy-plan-seo-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link> <dc:creator>Mike Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:47:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatsoftware.net/?p=530#comment-1187</guid> <description>I don&#039;t use Social Bookmarking as a &quot;Backlink&quot; tool.  I use SOcial&lt;br&gt;Bookmarking as a Rank Management tool.  I can flex my current rank of search&lt;br&gt;listings by submitting to social bookmarking sites.  The ones that matter&lt;br&gt;that is.  Yes, you are right, they have nofollow links on a bunch, but the&lt;br&gt;sites listed with Bookmarking Demon and SocialBot are focused on DoFollow&lt;br&gt;sites.  Social Bookmarking to big sites like Digg and Mixx can have a&lt;br&gt;serious impact on your website&#039;s ability to move up in the listings.  I use&lt;br&gt;it for every launch of every big product I do affiliate bonuses for and I&lt;br&gt;litterally watch my rank change.  It is a beautiful thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t use Social Bookmarking as a &#8220;Backlink&#8221; tool.  I use SOcial<br
/>Bookmarking as a Rank Management tool.  I can flex my current rank of search<br
/>listings by submitting to social bookmarking sites.  The ones that matter<br
/>that is.  Yes, you are right, they have nofollow links on a bunch, but the<br
/>sites listed with Bookmarking Demon and SocialBot are focused on DoFollow<br
/>sites.  Social Bookmarking to big sites like Digg and Mixx can have a<br
/>serious impact on your website&#39;s ability to move up in the listings.  I use<br
/>it for every launch of every big product I do affiliate bonuses for and I<br
/>litterally watch my rank change.  It is a beautiful thing.</p><p>Mike</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 14/32 queries in 0.683 seconds using disk

Served from: www.blackhatsoftware.net @ 2010-03-18 04:01:23 -->